Negotiating Differences: Personal Identity and Othering in Nella Larsen

Invited Presentation: ACT 11, Lisbon March 2004

This particular paper is an attempt to see the fate of one writer as the result of a specific historical and cultural situatedness. Nella Larsen’s own biography and her literary works can both be read as cultural texts, situating themselves in a particular socio-cultural context: The Harlem Renaissance. The themes she discusses in her literary works are specific to a racial and gendered discourse, and her own fate is readable as a text which is also marked by the dynamics of racial and gendered belonging and (fear of) exclusion. Complicating this dynamics of race and gender negotiations are economic and class related pressures on Larsen to achieve a means of living as a professional writer, pressures which ultimately led to her being silenced as an artist.


The paper gives, first, a biographical sketch of Larsen’s mixed, and to some extent obscure, origin and background. Here the focus is on the issues of race and ethnicity, and to some extent on class and economic issues. Second, the social construct of The Harlem Renaissance is presented as a force to be reckoned with in the USA of the 1920s. The third, longer, introductory segment, which is of a more theoretical and methodological nature, presents the notion of difference discourses as a tool for understanding and analysing texts in the widest sense of the word. The paper then moves on to looking more closely at Nella Larsen’s literary works in order to illustrate how these three frames add new layers of understanding to our readings of her fictional texts, as well as the text of her life. The readings focus in particular on her first novel, Quicksand (and especially on those portions of it that are set in Denmark), but also briefly discuss her second novel, Passing, and the concept of negotiating racial belonging that is known as “passing (for white)”. Finally the presentation looks at how Nella Larsen lost her foothold in the socio-cultural group of her choice, and how she was effectively ostracised from this position of belonging or cultural sanctuary.

 

Read full paper here...